7.2 Mechanical properties of cortical bone


7.2.1 Asymmetric stiffness and strength

@Bartel2006


7.2.2 Asymmetric stiffness and strength

@Bartel2006


7.2.3 Stiffness and strength with age

@Bartel2006


7.2.4 Graph Showing Relationship Between Age and Bone Mass

@OpenStaxAnatomy2020 Ch. 6

Bone density peaks at about 30 years of age. Women lose bone mass more rapidly than men.

(slide credit: @OpenStaxAnatomy2020 Ch. 6)


7.2.5 Volume fraction

  • Porosity is present in both cortical and trabecular bone
  • Define volume fraction (\(V_f\)) as the volume of actual bone tissue to the bulk volume
  • Cortical 70-95%
  • Trabecular 5-60%
  • Extremes are the young adult and elderly

7.2.6 Bone density

  • Density is strongly dependent on porosity and volume fraction
  • It is also a primary indicator of bone strength and stiffness
  • Apparent density is mass per bulk volume
  • Common measure of apparent density include:
    • Hydrated
    • De-hydrated
    • De-organified
  • Tissue density is mass per volume of actual bone tissue (2.0g/cc)
    • Importantly, this volume excludes vascular pore spaces

7.2.7 Relationship between bone density and volume fraction

  • The volume fraction, tissue density, and apparent density are related by \[\rho_{\mathrm{app}} = \rho_{\mathrm{tiss}} V_f\]
  • Apparent densities
    • Cortical – \(\approx\) 1.85 g/cc
    • Trabecular – 0.10-0.50 g/cc
  • Trabecular density decreases about 2% per decade after skeletal maturity
  • Note also the cortical bone wall thickness decreases as you age

7.2.8 Heterogeneity and variability


7.2.8.1 Strength

@Bartel2006


7.2.9 Mineral content

  • Mineral content is also important for mechanical properties
  • It is measured after heating bone to 700C for 24 hours (de-organification and drying)
  • Content increases during skeletal growth and remains fairly constant thereafter

7.2.10 Heterogeneity and variability


7.2.10.1 Stiffness

@Bartel2006


7.2.11 Density and strength

Average values

@Bartel2006


Regressions with age

@Bartel2006

  • \(\sigma = a \rho + b\)
  • \(\sigma = a \rho^b\)

7.2.12 Fatigue

@Bartel2006


7.2.13 Minor’s rule for fatigue

  • Hypothesis is that the fractional fatigue lives sum together and predict failure
  • \(\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{N_i}{N_{Fi}} = 1\)
    • Where there are \(n\) different load levels
  • Works well in most brittle metals (implants!)
  • Not validated for bone!!!
  • In bone, common assumption to replace stress with strain
    • Account for various levels of porosity, etc (also reduces variability in the test data)
  • What about bone remodeling?

7.2.14 Creep

@Bartel2006

  • De-vitalized bone exhibits creep
    • Resistance better in compression then tension
    • Difficult to test in-vivo response
  • Metals creep – may/may not be significant for ortho

@Bartel2006


7.2.15 Creep

@Bartel2006


7.2.16 Plasticity and micro-structural damage

@Bartel2006

  • Note the change in slope after yield – microdamage!

7.2.17 Strain rate sensitivity

@Bartel2006

  • Only a factor of two – mildly rate dependent
  • Probably not critical for most physiologic loads