7.2 Mechanical properties of cortical bone
7.2.1 Asymmetric stiffness and strength
@Bartel2006
7.2.2 Asymmetric stiffness and strength
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f9d7/3f9d7a6112432838e8dfde2916d958ddd32f77cd" alt=""
@Bartel2006
7.2.3 Stiffness and strength with age
@Bartel2006
7.2.4 Graph Showing Relationship Between Age and Bone Mass
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b497b/b497bb5a7f89a287ebcc08b69b95ad3993e85a9c" alt=""
@OpenStaxAnatomy2020 Ch. 6
Bone density peaks at about 30 years of age. Women lose bone mass more rapidly than men.
(slide credit: @OpenStaxAnatomy2020 Ch. 6)
7.2.5 Volume fraction
- Porosity is present in both cortical and trabecular bone
- Define volume fraction (\(V_f\)) as the volume of actual bone tissue to the bulk volume
- Cortical 70-95%
- Trabecular 5-60%
- Extremes are the young adult and elderly
7.2.6 Bone density
- Density is strongly dependent on porosity and volume fraction
- It is also a primary indicator of bone strength and stiffness
- Apparent density is mass per bulk volume
- Common measure of apparent density include:
- Hydrated
- De-hydrated
- De-organified
- Tissue density is mass per volume of actual bone tissue
(2.0g/cc)
- Importantly, this volume excludes vascular pore spaces
7.2.7 Relationship between bone density and volume fraction
- The volume fraction, tissue density, and apparent density are related by \[\rho_{\mathrm{app}} = \rho_{\mathrm{tiss}} V_f\]
- Apparent densities
- Cortical – \(\approx\) 1.85 g/cc
- Trabecular – 0.10-0.50 g/cc
- Trabecular density decreases about 2% per decade after skeletal maturity
- Note also the cortical bone wall thickness decreases as you age
7.2.8 Heterogeneity and variability
7.2.8.1 Strength
@Bartel2006
7.2.9 Mineral content
- Mineral content is also important for mechanical properties
- It is measured after heating bone to 700C for 24 hours (de-organification and drying)
- Content increases during skeletal growth and remains fairly constant thereafter
7.2.10 Heterogeneity and variability
7.2.10.1 Stiffness
@Bartel2006
7.2.11 Density and strength
Average values
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8d8a/b8d8ab05e9a5dc13a329ddf83c74334deba4a31e" alt=""
@Bartel2006
Regressions with age
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89dbb/89dbb0608f11a0ef62d8976dd72f7c93e001b224" alt=""
@Bartel2006
- \(\sigma = a \rho + b\)
- \(\sigma = a \rho^b\)
7.2.12 Fatigue
@Bartel2006
7.2.13 Minor’s rule for fatigue
- Hypothesis is that the fractional fatigue lives sum together and predict failure
- \(\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{N_i}{N_{Fi}} = 1\)
- Where there are \(n\) different load levels
- Works well in most brittle metals (implants!)
- Not validated for bone!!!
- In bone, common assumption to replace stress with strain
- Account for various levels of porosity, etc (also reduces variability in the test data)
- What about bone remodeling?
7.2.14 Creep
@Bartel2006
- De-vitalized bone exhibits creep
- Resistance better in compression then tension
- Difficult to test in-vivo response
- Metals creep – may/may not be significant for ortho
@Bartel2006
7.2.15 Creep
@Bartel2006
7.2.16 Plasticity and micro-structural damage
@Bartel2006
- Note the change in slope after yield – microdamage!
7.2.17 Strain rate sensitivity
@Bartel2006
- Only a factor of two – mildly rate dependent
- Probably not critical for most physiologic loads