Wolff’s Law
“Bone in a healthy person or animal will adapt to the loads it is
placed under” -Late 1800’s
1960’s
According to this a typical bone, e.g. the tibia has a security margin of about 5 to 7 between typical
load (2000 to 3000 μStrain) and fracture load (about 15000μStrain).
Mechanotransduction
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=mechano&part=A1859
This same effect is seen in Tendons, Ligaments,
Muscle, Bone, and to lesser extent Cartilage
What do you know about cartilage?
Hyaline (most commonly thought
of)
Fibrocartilage
Lines synovial joints (joints that
contain synovial fluid)
Dense, translucent, connective
tissue
Transitional cartilage found at the
margins of some joint capsules
Insertions of ligaments and tendons
into bone
Menisci, Annulus fibrosus
(vertebral disc)
Elastic cartilage
External ear
Eustacian tube, epiglottis, and
parts of the larynx
Hyaline Cartilage and Synovial Joints
Activity throughout a
lifetime requires
millions of joint cycles
Body has developed
an efficient way to deal
with activity while
minimizing wear
Hyaline Cartilage and Synovial Joints
Bartel refers to “articular
cartilage”
Allows joints to have a wide
range of motion
Joint surfaces covered with
2-4 mm of hyaline cartilage
Suited to withstand rigors of joint
environment without failing due to
cyclic loading
Isolated tissue
Distinct from bone
Devoid of blood supply, nerves
Cellular density less than any
other tissue
Primary Functions of Articular Cartilage
Distribute joint loads over a wide area in order to
decrease stress sustained by contacting joint surfaces
Allow relative movement of opposing
joint surfaces, while minimizing friction and
wear
Essential for growth and, development of bone
Less important to engineers
Composition and Structure of Articular
Cartilage
Chondrocytes (cartilage cells)
Matrix
Composition and Structure of Articular
Cartilage
Chondrocytes (cartilage cells)
Sparsely
distributed cells in articular
cartilage
Less than 10% of tissue volume
Manufacture, secrete, and maintain
organic component of extracellular matrix
(ECM)
Chondrocyte Distribution in Articular
Cartilage
Chondrocytes oblong, parallel
to articular surface
Chondrocytes round
Chondrocytes arranged
in columnar fashion
-between calcified and noncalcified
tissue
Chondrocyte Distribution in Articular
Cartilage
Chondrocytes oblong, parallel
to articular surface
Chondrocytes round
Chondrocytes arranged
in columnar fashion
-between calcified and noncalcified
tissue
Composition and Structure of
Articular Cartilage (continued)
Extracellular matrix (figure 4.8)
Composed
of dense framework of type II
collagen fibrils enmeshed in concentration
of proteoglycans (PG)
Collagen
(15-22% of wet weight)
Proteoglycans (4-7% of wet weight)
60-85% water content, inorganic salts, other
proteins, glycoproteins, and lipids
Composition and Structure of
Articular Cartilage (continued)
Collagen and Proteoglycans
Form
structural components that support
mechanical stresses applied to cartilage
Together with water determine biomechanical
behavior of cartilage
Collagen
Most abundant protein in the body
Think of it structurally as a rope
Tropocollagen is basic biological unit of collagen
Composed of 3 alpha chains coiled in left hand helices
Alpha chains coiled around each other in right hand triple
helix
Form tropocollagen molecules
Cross links formed between tropocollagen molecules
high tensile strength
Collagen Structure
Structure of Collagen in Articular Cartilage
Inhomogeniously distributed
Three zones
Superficial
Zone
Middle
tangential zone (STZ)
with highest concentration of collagen
zone
Collagen fibers randomly distributed and farther apart
Deep zone
Arrangement of Collagen in Articular Cartilage
Arrangement of Collagen in Articular Cartilage
Randomly layered fibrils
of collagen to
accommodate the high
concentration of
proteoglycans and water
•Pattern of collagen fibril arrangement related to tensile stiffness and strength
characteristics.
•Note correspondence between collagen and chondrocyte arrangement.
Strength of Collagen
Strong in tension
Weak in compression (high slenderness ratio:
length/width)
Material Properties of Articular
Cartilage
Anisotropic – differ with
direction of loading (may be
associated with zonal
arrangement of collagen)
“Split lines” – surface
collagen fiber pattern;
functionally related to tensile
strength
Referred to in Bartel
p133
Proteoglycan (PG)
Large protein-polysaccharide molecules
that exist as either monomers or as
aggregates
PG aggregation promotes
immobilization of the PG’s within the
collagen meshwork adding structural
rigidity to the extracellular matrix of
articular cartilage
Proteoglycan Aggregate
(-) charge
Water
Most abundant component of articular cartilage
80% concentrated near articular surface
Contains many mobile cations that greatly influence the
mechanical and physiochemical behaviors of cartilage, and
balance negative charge of PG’s (sodium, calcium)
Essential to health of avascular cartilage (permits movement
of gasses, nutrients, and waste products between
chondrocytes and surrounding nutrient-rich synovial fluid)
Movement of water (up to 70% under load) important in
controlling cartilage mechanical behavior
joint lubrication
Interaction Among Cartilage
Components
Collagen and proteoglycans interact to form a
porous composite fiber-reinforced organic solid
matrix that is swollen with water
Collagen-PG solid matrix and interstitial fluid
protect against high levels of stress and strain
developing in the ECM when articular cartilage
subjected to external loads
Organization of Cartilage
Biomechanical Loading of
Articular Cartilage
Forces at joint surface vary from zero to several
times body weight
“Contact” area varies in a complex manner;
typically only several square centimeters
Potentially high stress’s
Think of cartilage behavior with load as biphasic
(solid component and water)…wet sponge?
Arrangement of Collagen in Articular Cartilage
•Superficially:
•Tangential orientation of collagen
resists shear as joint surfaces move
past each other
Arrangement of Collagen in Articular Cartilage
•Middle:
•High water content, high PG
content
•With early load, water moves to
joint space and participates in
lubrication.
• With late load, negative charge of
PG molecules begin to repulse each
other and offer resistance to
compression
•Fairly isotropic
Stress-Strain Curve
Uniaxial tensile test:
•Constant low strain rate
•Dynamic young’s modulus
somewhere 40-400MPa
•Model does not
accommodate fluid flow, or
physiologic loading
Mechanical testing
•Confined compression
creep test: is a
uniaxial strain test.
•Confined chamber so
deformation can only
occur along axis of
loading,
•An applied constant
stress,
•Fluid can escape,
•Creep occurs and
eventually equilibrium
•Experiment is
repeated over various
stresses and
respective strains and
aggreate modulus HA
is obtained (typically
0.3-1.3 MPa)
Compression test of cartilage plug
(Mow 1977)
•Stress Relaxation
•Nonlinear phenomenon
Shear Stress
High poison’s ratio,
thus normal load
leads to large lateral
displacement
relative to bone thus
high shear stresses
at cartilage/bone
interface
Pure Shear
Small torsional displacements of cylindrical samples (which
produce pure shear), result in no volume change of the
cartilage to drive fluid flow.
The interstitial fluid (water) has low viscosity and does not
make an appreciable contribution to resisting shear.
Therefore, the resistance to shear is due to the solid matrix.
Tests of cartilage in shear show that the matrix behaves as a
viscoelastic solid
Remember: Pure shear is equivalent to a combination of tension
and compression applied at +/-45 degrees to the plane of shear
If shear can be thought of as partially a tensile force
and collagen resists tensile forces, then an increase in
collagen content should increase resistance to shear:
Likewise for compression and proteoglycan content
Less water means less proteoglycan per unit
volume? Also a function of ageing
Creep Test
Constant load
Deformation is not
instantaneous, as it would be in
a single-phase elastic material
such as a spring.
Displacement of the cartilage is
a function of time, since the fluid
cannot escape from the matrix
instantaneously
Initially, the displacement is
rapid. This corresponds to a
relatively large flow of fluid out
of the cartilage. As the rate of
displacement slows and the
displacement approaches a
constant value, the flow of fluid
likewise slows.
Equilibrium takes several
thousand seconds
Creep Test
Biphasic model
consideration leads to:
Aggregate modulus
Modulus
at
equilibrium 0.5 to 0.9
MPa (referred to
Young’s modulus of
cartilage
Permeability
Resistance
to flow
Permeability
Flow velocity proportional
to pressure gradient
10-15 to 10-16 m4/Ns
If a pressure difference of
210,000 Pa (about the
same pressure as in an
automobile tire) is applied
across a slice of cartilage
1 mm thick, the average
fluid velocity will be only
1*10-8 m/s, which is
about 100 million times
slower than normal
walking speed
As you compress the tissue, you do two things:
close the space for water to flow through by
compacting tissue, also increase charge density
thus slowing flow.
Putting it all together
As you stand
Complex interaction of stress in the cartilage
matrix and pressure in the fluid.
Cartilage stops itself from “bottoming out”
because its permeability decreases with
increased strain, and it’s stiffness increases.
Caritlage has to be thought of as a dynamic
structure (see example 4.2)
Clinical Correlate
Arthritic cartilage has a lower modulus and increased permeability
(higher water content, lower proteoglycan content).
This leads to greater and more-rapid deformation than normal.
Theoretically, these changes may influence the metabolic activity of
the chondrocytes, which are known to respond to their mechanical
environment (mechanotransduction).
Clinical Correlate
Hypothesis:
Cartilage
thought to fail in
tension/shear at
surface that
creates a fissure
that propagate
Fact:
Femoral head
arthritis far more
likely than talus
arthritis
Clinical Correlate
Old cartilage
fails earlier
than young
cartilage
Lubrication of Articular Cartilage
Synovial joints subjected to enormous
range of loading conditions
Cartilage typically sustains little wear
——————————————————-Implication:
Sophisticated lubrication process required
Joint Lubrication
Amazing engineering feat
Coefficient of friction of cartilage on
cartilage somewhere around 0.001!!!!
Compare to teflon on teflon .04
Lubrication Processes for Articular
Cartilage
(High loads)
Fluid-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
(Low loads)
Boundary Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Arthroplasty
Boundary Lubrication
Synovial fluid
constituent responsible
for boundry lubrication
• glycoprotein – lubricin
or
• phospholipid –
dipalmitoyl
phosphatidylcholine
??
Boundary Lubrication
Surfaces of cartilage protected by a layer of boundary
lubricant
Direct surface-to-surface contact is prevented
Most surface wear eliminated
Lubricin (glycoprotein) synovial fluid constituent
responsible for boundary lubricant
Absorbed as monolayer to each articular surface
Able to carry loads (normal forces) and reduce friction
Independent of physical properties of lubricant (e.g.,
viscosity) and bearing material (e.g., stiffness)
Primarily depends on chemical properties of lubricant
Functions under high loads at low relative velocities,
preventing direct contact between surfaces
Modes of Mixed Lubrication
Combination of fluid-film and boundary lubrication
Temporal coexistence of fluid-film and boundary lubrication at
spatially distinct locations
Joint surface load sustained by fluid-film and boundary lubrication
Most friction in boundary lubricated areas; most load supported by
fluid-film
Lubrication Processes for Articular
Cartilage
Fluid-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Boundary Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Fluid-film Lubrication
Thin film of lubricant separates bearing
surfaces
Load on bearing surfaces supported by
pressure developed in fluid-film
Lubrication characteristics determined by
lubricant’s properties
Rheological
properties
Viscosity and elasticity
Film geometry
Shape of gap between surfaces
Speed of relative motion of two surfaces
Lubrication Processes for Articular
Cartilage
Fluid-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Boundary Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Occurs when 2 nonparallel rigid bearing
surfaces lubricated by a fluid-film that
moves tangentially with respect to each
other
Wedge of converging fluid formed
Lifting pressure generated in wedge by
fluid viscosity as the bearing motion drags
fluid into gap
Schematic of Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Lubrication Processes for Articular
Cartilage
Fluid-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Boundary Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Occurs when weight bearing surfaces move
perpendicularly toward each other
Wedge of converging fluid formed
Pressure in fluid-film result of viscous resistance
of fluid that acts to impede its escape from the
gap
Sufficient to carry high loads for short durations
(eventually contact between asperities in
bearing surfaces)
Schematic of Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Schematic of Squeeze-film Lubrication
Articular Cartilage Asperities and
Lubrication
Articular cartilage not perfectly smooth;
asperities
Fluid film lubrication in regions of
cartilage non-contact
Boundary lubricant (lubricin) in areas of
asperities
Low rates of interfacial wear suggests
that asperity contact rarely occurs in
articular cartilage
Asperities
in Articular
Cartilage
Lubrication Processes for Articular
Cartilage
Fluid-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Boundary Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Mixed Lubrication
Modes of Mixed Lubrication
2. Boosted lubrication
Shift of fluid-film to boundary
lubrication with time over the
same location
Articular surfaces protected
during loading by
ultrafiltration of synovial
through the collagen-PG
matrix
Modes of Mixed Lubrication
2. Boosted lubrication (continued)
Solvent component of synovial fluid passes into the
articular cartilage during squeeze-film action yielding a
concentrated gel of HA protein complex that coats and
lubricates the surfaces
As articular surfaces approach each other, difficult for HA
macromolecules to escape from gap between surfaces
Variation of Lubrication Processes for Articular
Cartilage
Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
- associated with deformable articular cartilage
- pressure from fluid-film deforms surfaces
Fluid-film Lubrication
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Boundary Lubrication
Squeeze-film Lubrication
Comparison of Hydrodynamic and Squeeze-film
Lubrication under Rigid and Elastodynamic Conditions
Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
Beneficial increase in surface areas
Lubricant
escapes less rapidly from
between the bearing surfaces
Longer lasting lubricant film generated
Stress of articulation lower and more
sustainable
Elastohydrodynamic lubrication greatly
increases load bearing capacity
Dynamic Relationship between Vertical Load and Hip Joint
Lubrication
Support phase
Swing phase
Support phase
Swing phase
•Initial load on hip at heel contact
likely supported by hydrodynamic
lubrication
•Small vertical load on hip articular
cartilage supported by
hydrodynamic lubrication
•As load continues, fluid is
squeezed between articular
surfaces and is supported more by
squeeze-film lubrication
Dynamic Relationship between Vertical Load and Hip Joint
Lubrication
Time = start
•Load on hip supported by
squeeze-film lubrication
Time = 3 minutes
•Over time fluid-film may
be eliminated and surfaceto-surface contact may
occur
time = start
time = 3
minutes
•Surfaces protected by thin
layer of ultrafiltrated
synovial gel (boosted
lubrication) or by the
adsorbed lubricin
monolayer (boundary
lubrication)
Two Types of Wear of Articular Cartilage
Interfacial – due to interaction between bearing
surfaces
Adhesion wear – surface fragments from bearing surfaces in contact with
each other adhere and are torn away
Abrasion wear – soft material is scraped by hard material (opposing
surface or loose particles)
===========================================
Effective joint lubricating system makes interfacial wear unlikely under
normal articular cartilage conditions
Interfacial wear may take place in an impaired or degenerated
synovial joint
===========================================
Fatigue wear
due to accumulation of microscopic damage within the bearing material
under repetitive stress; not from surface-to-surface contact
Bearing surface failure from repeated application of high loads over short
period of time or repetition of low loads over long period of time
Potential Methods for Articular
Cartilage Degeneration
Magnitude of imposed stresses
Total number of sustained stress peaks
Change in the collagen-PG matrix
Change in mechanical properties of the
tissue
Articular Surface of Cartilage
Normal intact
surface
Eroded articular
surface
Vertical split in
articular surface